<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ekklesia Consortium &#187; God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ekklesia.to/category/articles/god/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ekklesia.to</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Beauty of God and Music, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://ekklesia.to/the-beauty-of-god-and-music-part-2</link>
		<comments>http://ekklesia.to/the-beauty-of-god-and-music-part-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Aniol</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekklesia.to/the-beauty-of-god-and-music-part-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The voice of history and the reality of God&#8217;s beauty
Mike HardingMusic speaks to every culture. One need not  speak the same language to enjoy the same piece of music, for music is a  language in itself. Not only does music transcend every culture, but also time,  for the same sonata, fugue, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana">The voice of history and the reality of God&#8217;s beauty<strong><br />
</strong><em><font size="2">Mike Harding</font></em></font><font face="Verdana" size="2">Music speaks to every culture. One need not  speak the same language to enjoy the same piece of music, for music is a  language in itself. Not only does music transcend every culture, but also time,  for the same sonata, fugue, and concerto can be enjoyed by those who live well  after it has been written. How did our ancestors view music? More particularly,  how did they relate the beauty of God to their choices of music? </font></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">The Historical Recognition of God’s Beauty </font></em></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Certainly one of the distinguishing marks of  Jonathan Edwards’ theology in relation to the whole history of Christian thought  is his radical elevation of beauty to preeminence among the divine perfections.  Augustine, however, reflected on the nature of beauty centuries earlier. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><strong>Augustine.</strong> In his <em>Confessions</em> he  said: “Too late I have loved you, O Beauty, so ancient and so new, too late have  I loved you. Behold, you were within me, while I was outside: it was there that  I sought you, and, as a deformed creature, rushed headlong upon these things of  beauty which you have made. . . . They kept me far from you, those fair things  which, if they were not in you, would not exist at all.” </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Beauty is the perfection of God’s divine being.  God alone is the essence of beauty in an original and exclusive sense. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><strong>Jonathan Edwards.</strong> For Edwards, beauty is  not only that “wherein the truest idea of divinity does consist,” but also “it  is first among the perfections of God; it constitutes in itself the perfection  of all the other divine attributes” (<em>Religious Affections,</em> p 298). </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">He argued that the source of beauty is God  Himself. God’s beauty is seen in His moral virtue and in the agreement (unity)  of the Godhead. Edwards said these qualities transfer to inanimate things in a  secondary beauty, consisting in “mutual consent and agreement of different  things, in form, manner, quality, and visible end or design; called by the  various names of regularity, order, uniformity, symmetry, proportion, harmony.”  Examples of such are “the mutual agreement of the various sides of a square, the  beautiful proportion of the various parts of the human body, and . . . the sweet  mutual consent and agreement of the various notes in a melodious tune” (<em>Essay  Concerning the Nature of True Value</em>, Chapter 3). </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">“It has pleased God to establish a law of  nature by virtue of which the uniformity and mutual correspondence of a  beautiful plant, the respect which the various parts of a regular building seem  to have to one another, and their agreement and union, and the consent or  concord of the various notes of a melodious tune, should appear beautiful  because therein is some image of the consent of mind, the different members of a  society or system of intelligent beings, sweetly united in a benevolent  agreement of heart. . . . And here I should further observe . . . that God has  so constituted nature, that the presenting of this inferior beauty, especially  in those kinds of it which have the greatest resemblance of the primary beauty,  as the harmony of sounds, and the beauties of nature, have a tendency to assist  those whose hearts are under the influence of a truly virtuous temper, to  dispose them to the exercises of divine love, and enliven in them a sense of  spiritual beauty” (Ibid.). </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Unregenerate people do not approve of beautiful  objects because they perceive this analogy; rather, their appreciation of beauty  is directly attributed to the common grace of God. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Beauty cannot originate from anyone other than  God Himself, and it is a window into heaven for those who have ears to hear and  eyes to see (regenerated hearts). God’s beauty is self-evident and speaks for  itself through its intrinsic power of attraction to a mind not surrendered to  the noetic effects of sin. </font></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">The Theological Reach of God’s Beauty: </font></em></p>
<p><strong><font face="Verdana" size="2">God is beautiful in His person. </font></strong></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Integrity of His being. God’s self-revelation  corresponds to what He actually is in word, deed, general revelation, and  special revelation. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Tri-unity of God. The tri-unity of God  culminates in absolute beauty. The Son is the perfect image of the Father, the  “express image of His person” (Heb 1.3), the “image of the invisible God” (Col  1.15); and the Holy Spirit perfectly testifies of the Son (John 15.26). </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Incarnation. The incarnation of the Son reveals  the beauty of God in a special way and to a supreme degree through the personal  (hypostatic) union of two such diverse natures as deity and humanity in one  person. Here, we have perfect unity without monotony, diversity without chaos,  with perfect proportion and splendor. </font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Verdana" size="2">God is beautiful in His perfections. </font> </strong></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">God’s attributes unite in perfect harmony.  There is no greater variety than God’s infinite perfections, nor a more  intensive unity. Though holiness governs all of God’s attributes (Isa 6), the  Bible does not exalt one attribute of God at the expense of the others. They  form a glorious, harmonious whole without any inherent contradiction. The  absence of chaos or monotony in His divine attributes amplifies His absolute  beauty. They also mutually contribute to God’s purpose and performance  manifesting the splendor to which man should respond. </font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Verdana" size="2">God is beautiful in His purpose. </font></strong></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">God has an eternal plan which embraces all that  comes to pass (Ro 9.8–24; Eph 1.4–12; Jn 6.22–66). Based on His own holy and  wise counsel, God governs, efficaciously or permissively, every detail of His  universe in accordance with His perfect and unchanging plan. The chief aim of  His purpose is to bring glory to Himself which is the aim of all beauty.  Furthermore, there is perfect harmony between the purpose and performance of  God. </font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Verdana" size="2">God is beautiful in His performances. </font> </strong></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Creation. Each person of the Godhead perfectly  and harmoniously exercised His role in the Creation of the universe, earth, and  man. The product, prior to the fall, was absolutely beautiful including a  natural order which reflects the glory of God and culminating in man who was  made in the image of God (Ge 1.31 “very good”). </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The mistake many have made at this point is to  seek the beauty of God’s creation and miss the beauty of the Creator [cf. Ro  1.18ff] (cf. Augustine’s quote). </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Redemption. Salvation is beautiful in that it  involves perfect and harmonious actions of the triune God. The product of  salvation is beautiful in that it blots out the ugliness of sin and restores the  believer in the image of God which was marred at the fall. The believer is a new  man created by God in righteousness, holiness, and true knowledge. Finally,  salvation culminates in the believer being conformed to the image of Christ  through glorification (Ro 8.28–29). </font></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">The Practical Response to God’s Beauty </font></em></p>
<blockquote><p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">Let the beauty of the Lord our God be upon    us. Ps 90.17 </font></em></p></blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The objective view of beauty evaluates the arts  on the basis of excellence of craft and the admirability of the object. The  subjective view evaluates beauty on the basis of human response alone and  experience. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Immanuel Kant, father of the Enlightenment,  maintained that beauty was solely subjective and that art could be considered  beautiful only if it produced desired feelings in the audience (Critique of  Judgment). Kant’s ideas have deep roots in modern culture. Since Kant denied the  reality of God, he also denied the reality of objective beauty. To Kant, God was  whatever you “postulated” Him to be; likewise, beauty was whatever the  individual wanted it to be. Kant exalted the idolatry of self. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Relativism encourages us to make choices based  on what makes us feel good, rather than on the basis of excellence and  admirability. We must learn to enjoy that which is admirable and excellent  through study, discipline, proper exposure, and teaching. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">C. S. Lewis wrote in An Experiment in  Criticism, “the first demand art makes on us is to surrender.” Art is  communication, and we must carefully analyze it to see to what we are  surrendering. Unity (without monotony), Diversity (without chaos), Proportion  (without distortion), and Splendor (the ability to manifest one’s perfections  and attributes) describe the object, not the listener. They are qualities of the  piece of music, and either they are there or not there. Just as a reader must  have a good knowledge of language to appreciate fine books, so a listener must  have a knowledge of music to appreciate fine compositions. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Our culture is so steeped in pop music that  requires nothing of us that we may soon forget there is anything else to be  known other than the trite and profane. If we understand, for instance, that it  takes a musician 15 to 20 years to learn to play the cello well, shouldn’t we be  willing to work a bit and learn to listen well? With an objective, God-centered  view of beauty vis av vis a subjective, man-centered view, we will see what is  good even when it doesn’t please us, giving great works the chance to speak to  us over time. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The objective view of beauty also protects our  sensibilities from lethargy and carnality. It takes little patience or work to  enjoy the things on which Americans spend most of their time. Television, pop  music, movies, fast food, advertising, etc. are all designed to be easily  digested by a dumbed-down general public. They require little if anything of us.  As a result, we become lethargic, and our attention span decreases, losing the  ability to see as God sees, hear as God hears, and perceive as God perceives. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">A theocentric (God-centered) view of beauty  also develops a sense of “taste.” Some think taste simply means “personal  preference,” but the Miriam-Webster Dictionary defines taste as “the power or  practice of discerning or enjoying whatever constitutes excellence, especially  in the fine arts.” As such, taste is a facet of wisdom, the skillful application  of God’s truth, and the ability to distinguish what has value from what does  not. Learning to enjoy what is admirable is to improve our tastes and a sure way  of glorifying God for the gifts He has given our artists. Animals do not possess  “taste” and appreciate beauty, either their own, or anyone else’s; it is a gift  to men alone made in His image (Gen 1.27–29). </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Some mistakenly equate subjective enjoyment  with objective excellence. There is such a thing as a counterfeit aesthetic  experience, that is, the feeling that you have experienced something profound  when all you have really experienced is a fake. Whether it is a telephone  commercial on TV that brings a tear to the eye or a pop song that manipulates  our emotions, entertainers have learned how to get a cheap response from their  audience when nothing admirable or excellent has been offered. Like a cheat,  some offer an emotional experience; and the naive mistake it for a spiritual  experience. This is the artistic equivalent of fast food – all the fun of real  food with none of the nutrition. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Pop culture, unfortunately, is determining the  worship in many “evangelical” churches. The result is that we are increasingly  offering cheap, sensational, and superficial Christian music which at best is  smarmy and “feel good.” There is a creeping banality in our musical choices. The  main requirement is popularity without admirability. If the most important thing  in music is that we “feel good,” what is to stop us from following our appetites  for their own sake in other areas. When left to ourselves, our sensibilities  always tend toward the low, debased, superficial, trendy, and eventually the  depraved (Rom 1.18–31). </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><strong>Conclusion</strong> Kant articulated the  modernists’ position: There are no absolutes; therefore, we can know beauty only  by our subjective feelings. Edwards, who has all but been forgotten in our  modern age, reflected the Biblical view declaring that the source of beauty is  the nature of God. Christians hold to absolutes. Why not here? </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The way to live faithfully in our world and not  be of our world is to lead the way regarding the nature of beauty. Why should we  design another shapeless building in which to proclaim the eternal truths of  God? Lewis said we will not read nothing. If we do not read good books, we will  read bad books. If we do not delight in refined things, we will delight in  debased ones. The same is true of music. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Man must submit his intellect to the truth of  God, his emotions to the love of God, his will to the holiness of God, and his  aesthetic values to the beauty of God. Since Christ is the apex of the beauty of  God, conformity to the image of Christ is the ultimate and chief result of man’s  response to the beauty of God. John said, “We shall be like him; for we shall  see him as he is.” (1Jn 3.2) Isaiah foretold of that day when we shall see the  returning Christ: “Thine eyes shall see the King in His beauty.” (Isa 33.17) </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ekklesia.to/the-beauty-of-god-and-music-part-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Beauty of God and Music, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://ekklesia.to/the-beauty-of-god-and-music-part-1</link>
		<comments>http://ekklesia.to/the-beauty-of-god-and-music-part-1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Aniol</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekklesia.to/the-beauty-of-god-and-music-part-1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike HardingA Rembrandt who creates a work of art deserves  to hear the response from the person who gazes upon it, “That is beautiful!” The  eternal God who is infinite in all His perfections deserves to hear the response  from the believer who contemplates Him, “God is beautiful!” If God is invisible, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana"><em><font size="2">Mike Harding</font></em></font><font face="Verdana" size="2">A Rembrandt who creates a work of art deserves  to hear the response from the person who gazes upon it, “That is beautiful!” The  eternal God who is infinite in all His perfections deserves to hear the response  from the believer who contemplates Him, “God is beautiful!” If God is invisible,  how then can He be considered beautiful? Have you ever heard a beautiful  symphony? Beauty does not always refer simply to the physical, but also to that  which is audible. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Beauty also transcends that which is visible  and audible. Miquel Najdorf, the Polish chess grand master, received a  brilliancy prize for a chess victory which has come to be known as the ‘Polish  immortal.’ A relatively short game (22 moves), containing diverse combinations  of play with seven sacrifices by Najdorf leading through a series of forced  moves on his opponent’s part, culminated in a crushing checkmate. This  particular chess game is truly beautiful – beautiful not because of the shape or  color of the pieces used, but because of the logical coherence and variety in  the combination of force, time, and space within the principles of the game of  chess. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">This leads to the question, What is the essence  of beauty? Relativism is the general malaise of our time. An increasing  percentage of the so-called intelligentsia holds that there are no absolutes.  Churches have also been seduced by the same unbiblical thinking. They have  accepted the modernist position that beauty is purely a matter of preference.  They maintain that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder;” this is the emotional  or psychological theory which locates beauty in the response of the perceiver.  Beauty, however, is a force with which to be reckoned. Even the unbelieving  opera lover may unconsciously know something of the profundity of God’s beauty  through common grace that the professing Christian remains ignorant of: namely,  that beauty is<br />
a significant element of God’s nature and creation, and that beauty is a  reflection of the character and ways of God which can be objectively evaluated.  As such, a God-centered view of beauty locates beauty in certain qualities  inherent in realities. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">In a Christian view of aesthetics, three  qualities are usually identified: (1) unity or integrity – a well-knit internal  unity, completeness, or whole; (2) proportion or harmony – an orderly,  harmonious relation and arrangement of the parts; (3) splendor – a definite  capacity for manifesting its pattern. These three qualities result in unity  without monotony and variety without chaos. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">God, in His person, perfections, purpose, and  performance, exemplifies the qualities of unity, proportion, and splendor. The  triune God is indeed the supreme example of unity without monotony and variety  without chaos. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">This article (one of two) will examine the  reality of God’s beauty from a biblical perspective as it pertains to our music  choices. The next article will examine this issue from a historical and  theological perspective. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The Word of God uses a rich variety of words to  express the concept of the beauty of God: beauty, excellency, glory, honor, and  majesty. </font></p>
<blockquote><p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">Hast thou an arm like God? or canst thou    thunder with a voice like him? Deck thyself now with majesty and excellency;    and array thyself with glory and beauty. (Job 40.9–10) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">O LORD, our Lord, how excellent is thy    name in all the earth! (Ps 8.9) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">Thou art fairer than the children of men:    grace is poured into thy lips therefore God hath blessed thee for ever. Gird    thy sword upon thy thigh, O most mighty, with thy glory and thy majesty. And    in thy majesty ride prosperously because of truth and meekness and    righteousness; and thy right hand shall teach thee terrible things. (Ps    45.2–4) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">I will speak of the glorious honor of thy    majesty, and of thy wondrous works. All thy works shall praise thee, O LORD;    and thy saints shall bless thee. They shall speak of the glory of thy kingdom,    and talk of thy power; To make known to the sons of men his mighty acts, and    the glorious majesty of his kingdom. (Ps 145.5, 10–12) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">They shall lift up their voice, they shall    sing for the majesty of the LORD, they shall cry aloud from the sea. (Isa    24.14) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">Let favor be showed to the wicked, yet    will he not learn righteousness: in the land of uprightness will he deal    unjustly, and will not behold the majesty of the LORD. (Isa 26.10) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">It shall blossom abundantly, and rejoice    even with joy and singing: the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it, the    excellency of Carmel and Sharon, they shall see the glory of the LORD, and the    excellency of our God. (Isa 35.2) </font></em></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><em>And the LORD their God shall save them in    that day as the flock of his people: for they shall be as the stones of a    crown, lifted up as an ensign upon his land. For how great is his goodness,    and how great is his beauty! (Zec 9.16–17)</em> </font></p></blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The word of God contains certain principles  which guide our music choices. Our choices must be framed by the implications of  Scripture rather than the standards of the world. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><strong>Implication 1:</strong> Anything not like God is  ungodly! Contrary to what the world would have us believe, music is not immune  from the effects of sin. Music is not simply neutral as some suggest. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Harold M. Best, the Dean of Music at Wheaton  College opines in his book, Music Through The Eyes of Faith: “There is nothing  un-Christian or anti-Christian about any kind of music.” (p 52); “The Christian  is free of the moral nothingness of music. . . .” (p 59) </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">How does this square with God’s Word?  Throughout Scripture, we find that music is intrinsically moral. Good music is  that which displays the beauty of God. We are to sing unto the Lord in the  beauty of holiness. </font></p>
<blockquote><p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">And when he had consulted with the people,    he appointed singers unto the LORD, and that should praise the beauty of    holiness. (2Ch 20.21) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">I will praise the LORD according to his    righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high. (Ps    7.17) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">Give unto the LORD the glory due unto his    name: bring an offering, and come before him: worship the LORD in the beauty    of holiness. (1Ch 16.29) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">Give unto the LORD the glory due unto his    name; worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness. (Ps 29.2) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">In that day shall the LORD of hosts be for    a crown of glory, and for a diadem of beauty, unto the residue of his people.    (Isa 28.5) </font></em></p></blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The word “holiness” comes from the Hebrew word  qadesh (</font><font face="HebraicaII" size="2">vd&#8217;q;</font><font face="Verdana" size="2">)  which literally means “to cut, to separate, distinct apartness, set apart as  sacred by God’s presence.” First, qadesh refers to the majestic transcendence of  God emphasizing the Creator/creature distinction. Second, it means that God is  separate in His being from all that is evil, impure, and defiled. His own being  defines purity with no trace of darkness in it. Holiness is God’s self-affirming  purity. Nothing outside of God, Himself, can define it. In the sheer weight  (glory) of God’s almighty presence, men must worship God in the majestic beauty  of holiness. Beauty is defined by God’s being, not by men’s subjective opinions.  Beauty is not in the mind of the beholder. It exists first and foremost in the  mind of God. Man, who is created in the image of God, reflects beauty in  holiness, righteousness, wisdom (the skilled application of God’s truth), and  knowledge. Beauty must be defined by the objective character of God and not by  the subjective impulses of unregenerate men. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Our music should not blur the Creator/creature  distinction by communicating undue familiarity with God in the lyrical text or  an irreverent demeanor, mood, atmosphere, or disposition in the musical  composition and performance style. Further, our music should be free from all  aspects of impurity and evil in its cultural associations. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Righteousness relates to God’s holiness by  corresponding to that which is right. Righteousness entails rectitude of action  and disposition according to the perfect standard of Holiness. Righteous music  operates according to the standard of holiness – God’s self-affirming purity  which sets Him above His creation and separates Him from anything that defiles.  There must be righteousness in musical text, composition, and performance style  which operates according to the perfect standard of God’s being and the  objective, timeless principles of God’s Word which are rooted in the unchanging,  absolute character of God. Man cannot unilaterally operate on his own  self-autonomy. To do so is sheer, unmitigated idolatry. True beauty, which is  the basis for all the arts, exists originally and eternally in the mind and  nature of God. Our concept of beauty must correspond to God’s mind which we can  know only through Scripture, and which we can see remnants of (His beauty) in a  sin-cursed creation. God commands us to mirror His holiness and perfection. To  abandon that standard invites the severest judgment and displeasure of God.  Holiness is the standard for sacred music. Righteousness is the corresponding  action which must conform to the standard. </font></p>
<blockquote><p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">We are natural musicians because of the    special nature of the human brain . . . . Our responsiveness to music,    however, like our responsiveness to language (is) . . . unique in the animal    kingdom” (Tone Deaf and All Thumbs? by Frank R. Wilson, Neurologist: p. 2,    68). </font></em></p></blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><strong>Implication 2:</strong> God is our new song. </font></p>
<blockquote><p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">The LORD is my strength and song, and is    become my salvation. (Ps 118.14) </font></em></p>
<p><em><font face="Verdana" size="2">Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust,    and not be afraid: for the LORD JEHOVAH is my strength and my song; he also is    become my salvation. (Isa 12.2) </font></em></p></blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The unsaved, natural man, appreciates music for  various self-serving purposes. The music we listen to, the music which we  perform, the music we entertain ourselves with each one is a uniquely different  purpose – to bring glory to God. When we sing and play our instruments for the  Lord, we are to image, mirror, and reflect to our listeners who God is and what  He is like. In that way, God is our new song! </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><strong>Conclusion</strong> God is worthy of receiving  our praise and adoration through the medium of music. He has ordained that music  be employed in the worship of His majesty. Therefore, it is incumbent upon his  worshipers to approach Him in a godly fashion and with a godly purpose. </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ekklesia.to/the-beauty-of-god-and-music-part-1/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Greatness of God: His Self-Existence</title>
		<link>http://ekklesia.to/the-greatness-of-god-his-self-existence</link>
		<comments>http://ekklesia.to/the-greatness-of-god-his-self-existence#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Aniol</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekklesia.to/the-greatness-of-god-his-self-existence</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John MooreOn January 7, 1855, C. H. Spurgeon opened his morning sermon  with these words: 
   “It has been said by someone that ‘the proper study of    mankind is man.’ I will not oppose the idea, but I believe it is equally true    that the proper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana"><em><font size="2">John Moore</font></em></font><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">On January 7, 1855, C. H. Spurgeon opened his morning sermon  with these words: </font></font></p>
<blockquote><p> <font face="Verdana">  </font><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">“It has been said by someone that ‘the proper study of    mankind is man.’ I will not oppose the idea, but I believe it is equally true    that the proper study of God’s elect is God; the proper study of the Christian    is the Godhead. The highest science, the loftiest speculation, the mightiest    philosophy which can ever engage the attention of a child of God is the name,    the nature, the person, the work, the doings and the existence of the great    God whom he calls his Father. There is something exceedingly improving to the    mind in a contemplation of the Divinity.” </font></font></p></blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">Spurgeon’s words are astoundingly appropriate for believers  even today. We live in an age in which the attention, the focus, the interest,  the concern of many Christians is upon Christians and not necessarily upon the  wonders of the Christian’s God. Believers often study the Scriptures not to know  God but to know what God can do for them. Where does a “contemplation of the  Divinity” fit into the busy schedule of “Joe Believer” who just wants to know  how he can solve his most urgent problem and how he can somehow fit a little bit  of God and His program into his already crammed week? As we seem to fly through  this life at an ever-increasing pace, it is good for us to step back and  contemplate our God that we might know Him better. One area of the contemplation  of God that is especially profitable to ponder is those aspects of His nature  and character that reflect His greatness. One aspect of God’s greatness that is  especially challenging to consider is His self-existence. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2"><strong>God exists in and of Himself.</strong> When God confronted Moses  on Mount Horeb in Exodus 3, spoke to him in the burning bush and enlisted Moses  to go back to Egypt as His spokesman, Moses requested what name for God he  should use to tell the people of Israel who sent him. God referred to Himself in  v 14 as, “I AM WHO I AM” (NASB). Moses was to tell the people of Israel that “I  AM” had sent him back to Egypt. This name of God in the Hebrew text is from the  verb that means “to be.” The Septuagint (LXX), the Greek translation of the OT,  renders this whole phrase, “I am the one who is.” A good English translation  would be something like, “I am He who is.” </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">Was God simply telling Moses that He existed and that He is  real? No. God’s revelation of His name to Moses tells us much more. It reflects  the fact that it is God’s nature to exist and that He continually exists in and  of Himself. God is self-existent. His existence is rooted in Himself alone and  in nothing else and in no one else. He is because He is! Why does He exist?  Because of Himself! How does He exist? Because of Himself! The ground and source  of God’s existence rests solely in His own<br />
being. It is His nature to exist. While this concept may be somewhat hard to  grasp, it helps to consider what God’s self-<br />
existence means and what its implications it have for us. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2"><strong>God’s self-existence means He is uncaused.</strong> Jesus  declared in John 5.26 that “the Father has life in Himself.” (NASB) There is  nothing that gives life to God. There was nothing that caused God to come into  being. He has life in Himself! He exists because of the necessity of His own  being. He did not cause Himself to be. He simply and eternally and profoundly IS  the one and only true and living God. It is revealing that God’s Word never  argues for His existence. Scripture never tries to explain how He came to be,  where He came from, or why He exists. The fundamental assumption is that God is!  The Scriptures simply testify to who He is and what He has done. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">God is uncaused. In contrast, every other thing that exists,  living and non-living, exists because of something other than itself. The cars  we drive, the clothes we wear, the homes we live in, the food we eat, all of it  exists because of someone or something else. God is the only One who is  uncaused. He is the only Being whose existence rests in Himself. Everything else  that exists is derived from something or someone else, and the ultimate source  of everything else that exists is God! God is uncreated and self-existent.  Everything else has been created by Him and is sustained by Him. (cf. Ps 24.1;  50.10–12; 89.11–12; Ge 1.1) Every rock, every molecule, and every single speck  of dust that exists in this universe from one end to the other exists because of  God. Every living thing that crawls, flies, swims, or walks, everything that has  life, including man, has life because of God. We exist because of God. </font> </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">There are some powerful implications to the fact that God is  uncaused while He causes everything and everyone else to exist. First, God is  not answerable to anyone, but everyone and everything are answerable to Him.  Nobody caused God to exist and therefore nobody has a claim on Him. He does not  need to defend Himself to anyone or to anything. He does not need to explain His  actions to anyone. When Job wanted a hearing with God to lay out his complaint,  God asked, “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?” (Job 38.4)  Nobody is going to call God “on the carpet” in heaven for treating them in a way  not to their liking. Nobody is going to call Him to the witness stand and demand  Him to defend His actions. But, every single person who has ever lived will have  to give an account to God. Secondly, God is not at the disposal of anyone but  everyone and everything that exists is at His disposal. Man does not tell God  what to do. God doesn’t exist to do our bidding. We exist to do His. God does  not exist to glorify us. We exist to glorify Him. We owe our existence to Him.  He is free (within the confines of His own character, nature, and purposes) to  do with us as He wishes and to direct the paths of our life the way He desires.  The amazing thing is that the One to Whom we are answerable and at Whose  disposal we are, He knows us and we can know Him personally through Jesus  Christ; He is our heavenly Father, and He does everything for our ultimate good  and His greatest glory! </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2"><strong>God’s self-existence means He is independent.</strong> God is  not only uncaused but also He is independent in His being. He is not dependent  on anyone or anything outside of Himself. When the apostle Paul confronted the  philosophers in Athens, he declared to them that God was not “served by human  hands, as though He needed anything.” (Ac 17.25a) God does not need anything. He  doesn’t need anything from His creation to exist. He especially doesn’t need  anything from man. He is absolutely independent from His creation. The truth is  that everything is dependent upon Him: “Since He Himself gives to all life and  breath and all things.” (Ac 17.25b) </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">Psalm 104 tells us that God provides for the animal world. He  sends rain for the grass to grow. He has set the order and working of the moon  and the sun. He provides for man. He sustains everything that exists by His  power. He makes provision for all that He has created. Everything that exists  depends upon Him, BUT God depends on nothing! He is independent in His will, His  purposes, His power, His decrees, and His actions! </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">God’s independence means that He is sufficient unto Himself.  The bottom line is that He does not need us. Over the years, there has been some  questionable theology floating around that somehow makes man and creation  necessary for God: “God needs us; that is why He created us. He was lonely, and  so He created man to keep him company. He had no one to love, therefore He  created man to have someone to love. He lacked glory, therefore He made man to  supply His glory. He needed worshipers, so He created man to worship Him.” </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">God is not lonely. He does not need someone to love. (God the  Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, the three persons of the Triune God  have existed in a loving relationship from all eternity.) God does not need us  to glorify Him. He does not need us as worshipers. He can make stones to worship  Him. He doesn’t need us to accomplish His purposes. However, God has CHOSEN to  create us. He has chosen to love us. He has chosen to allow us to glorify Him.  He has chosen to use us as the means by which His message and work would go  forth. It is an astounding, incomprehensible privilege that God has chosen by  His good pleasure to even include us as a part of His plan and purposes. He  could have bypassed us. He could accomplish, if He had so ordained, His purposes  just as well without us. It is our gain that He has given man the opportunity to  know and serve Him. It is our loss if we reject Him and fail to worship,  glorify, and serve Him! </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">When we, as believers, fully grasp that God exists in and of  Himself and Himself alone and that He is utterly independent and has no need  whatsoever of us, it makes His mercy, grace, and love toward sinful, rebellious  creatures such as ourselves all the more amazing and incredible. It is  astounding that He would create us, love us, provide for us, and sacrifice His  only Son to redeem us that we could have the unmerited honor of loving Him and  praising Him forever. God is great because He exists in and of Himself. He is  great because He is uncaused. He is great because He is independent. May God’s  people by God’s grace understand more fully the greatness of His self-existence.  May our contemplation of this profound attribute of our great God move us to  praise and worship Him all the more fully!</font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ekklesia.to/the-greatness-of-god-his-self-existence/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God, Independent and Omnipotent</title>
		<link>http://ekklesia.to/god-independent-and-omnipotent</link>
		<comments>http://ekklesia.to/god-independent-and-omnipotent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Aniol</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekklesia.to/god-independent-and-omnipotent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott WilliquetteThere is a movement swelling in evangelical circles that teaches a position  called “The Openness of God” or “the Open View of God.” The leaders of this  movement believe that God is not omnipotent or completely sovereign, but  omnicompetent. In other words, God is not all-knowing, all-powerful and  all-sovereign. He [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana"><em><font size="2">Scott Williquette</font></em></font>There is a movement swelling in evangelical circles that teaches a position  called “The Openness of God” or “the Open View of God.” The leaders of this  movement believe that God is not omnipotent or completely sovereign, but  omnicompetent. In other words, God is not all-knowing, all-powerful and  all-sovereign. He is all-competent, that is, He is able to cope with or handle  whatever happens in His universe. According to these men, God is not  all-knowing, rather God learns from us. According to these men, God is not  independent from His creatures, rather God is dependent on us. Note the  following quotations from the book The Openness of God, published by  InterVarsity Press. “God works with human decisions, adapting his own plans to  fit the changing situation. God does not control everything that happens.  Rather, he is open to receiving input from his creatures.”(p 7) “Instead of  perceiving the entire course of human existence in one timeless moment, God  comes to know events as they take place. He learns something from what  transpires. We call this position the ‘open view of God’ because it regards God  as open to new experiences and as flexible . . . as dependent on the world in  certain respects.”(Richard Rice, p 16) “God willingly surrenders power and makes  possible a partnership with the creature.” God is “an ‘ad hoc’ God, one who  responds and adapts to surprises and to the unexpected.”(Clark Pinnock, p 113)  While we may be tempted to think that these heretical ideas are being championed  by “outsiders” and that our fundamental Baptist churches will never be affected  by them, that simply is not true. Professors at some leading evangelical  colleges and seminaries, as well as a number of influential evangelical  publishing houses are promoting these views. If we are not careful, it will not  be long before these heresies percolate down into our pews and our pulpits. This  article will provide a quick review of what the Bible actually teaches about God  and His control over creation. The Creator God controls all things. He is not  dependent on us for anything. He is not powerless to accomplish His plan. He is  not at our beck and call.</p>
<p><strong>God controls all things and leaves nothing to chance.</strong> The closing half  of Ephesians 1.11 reads, “who [God] works out everything in conformity with the  purpose of his will.” Nothing is left to chance, and nothing is left to a joint  divine/human decision. God has a plan, and He will “work out” everything in that  plan. These words “work out” come from the Greek word ejnergevw, from which we  get our word “energy.” It means “to energetically accomplish something,” “to  carry something out,&#8221; or “to work and bring something to pass.” God does not  simply plan and then watch and hope. In eternity past God planned, and now in  time He energetically works such that that plan actually comes to pass. God  insures the accomplishment of His eternal plan, by bringing it to pass Himself.  Paul could not be any clearer here. God has an eternal plan that includes  everything that occurs in His creation, both great and small (from the buying  and wearing of a pair of shoes, to the birth of a child; from the construction  of a bologna sandwich, to the construction of a church building). God’s will is  all-encompassing. It includes everything that will ever come to pass. Not only  is God’s will and plan all-encompassing, it is also certain to come to pass.  Why? Because God Himself is energetically accomplishing it. God has planned  everything, and everything that He has planned will certainly come to pass.</p>
<p>The fact that God controls all things is also clear from individual examples  stated in Scripture: God planned the maintenance of the universe (Ps 119.89–91);  God planned the life span and living place of every human being (Job 14.5; Ac  17.26); God planned the rise and fall of every earthly ruler (Ro 13.1); God  planned the circumstances of every person’s life (Jas 4.13–15); God planned the  actions of every human being (both good and wicked) (Eph 2.10; Ge 50.20; Ac  2.23); God planned the most trivial of circumstances (Job 36.22–33); and God  planned the certainty of prophetic events (Isa 14.24,27).</p>
<p><strong>God does whatever He desires with His creation and with human beings.</strong>  The Bible makes no bones about the fact that God is in absolute control of every  molecule of creation including man.</p>
<p>Psalm 115.3 reads, “Our God is in heaven; he does whatever pleases him.”</p>
<p>Psalm 135.5–6 reads, “I know that the LORD is great, that our Lord is greater  than all gods. The LORD does whatever pleases him, in the heavens and on the  earth, in the seas and all their depths.”</p>
<p>Daniel 4.35 reads, “All the peoples of the earth are regarded as nothing. He  does as he pleases with the powers of heaven and the peoples of the earth. No  one can hold back his hand or say to him: “What have you done?”</p>
<p>Isaiah 46.9–11 reads, ‘I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there  is none like me. I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times,  what is still to come. I say: My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I  please. From the east I summon a bird of prey; from a far-off land, a man to  fulfill my purpose. What I have said, that will I bring about; what I have  planned, that will I do.”</p>
<p>Is God dependent upon man? Does God need man’s help when it comes to running  the universe? Does the Bible teach that God is a dependent or independent being?  Does the Bible teach that God is an omnicompetent or omnipotent being? There is  no question as to what the Bible teaches. God is dependent upon man for nothing.  It is man who is utterly dependent upon God. God is independent and omnipotent.  He has need of no one and no thing. He is in absolute sovereign control of all  things, and possesses all power.</p>
<p>Why is it important that we understand and champion the doctrines of God’s  independence and sovereign omnipotence? There are certain selfish reasons. It’s  comforting to know that an all-knowing and all-wise being is in control. It is  comforting to know that everything you go through is planned by a being who is  infinite in wisdom. It is comforting to know that the plan of salvation and the  security connected with that plan can never be thwarted because God’s plans  always come to pass. There are two more important reasons why we must understand  and champion these doctrines. First, if we follow the lead of those who deny  God’s independence and sovereign omnipotence we are exchanging the truth for a  lie. Second, the more we grasp of the greatness of God the more loving and  adoring will be our worship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ekklesia.to/god-independent-and-omnipotent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does God Repent or Change His Mind?</title>
		<link>http://ekklesia.to/does-god-repent-or-change-his-mind</link>
		<comments>http://ekklesia.to/does-god-repent-or-change-his-mind#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Aniol</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekklesia.to/does-god-repent-or-change-his-mind</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott WilliquettePrayer changes things!” “When I pray God listens and answers.” “God has a  perfect plan for your life, but if you rebel against it, He permits you to go  your own way.” Are these statements true? The first two may be, depending on  your perspective. Indeed God uses our prayers. “The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana"><em><font size="2">Scott Williquette</font></em></font><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">Prayer changes things!” “When I pray God listens and answers.” “God has a  perfect plan for your life, but if you rebel against it, He permits you to go  your own way.” Are these statements true? The first two may be, depending on  your perspective. Indeed God uses our prayers. “The prayer of a righteous man is  powerful and effective” (Jas 5:16). So yes, prayer changes things and God does  listen and answer our prayers. But when some make these statements they actually  mean: “Prayer informs God and thus changes His mind;” “When I pray God listens,  learns, and answers accordingly.” These are heretical ideas. The third statement  is not true because it implies that God has a plan and that man by his actions  can thwart that plan. This too is heretical. Statements like these are common  place in both fundamental Baptist circles and in evangelical Christianity in  general. The underlying assumption of those who hold to these heretical views is  that God sometimes changes His mind as He deals with His creation. They assume  that God is influenced by prayer and that He is capable of repenting, and of  changing His plan from one thing to another. This theological perspective is  present in both church pews and the classrooms of evangelical colleges and  seminaries. I personally have caught wind of it in more than one of our  fundamental Baptist colleges. This article will list the biblical texts which  teach with absolute clarity that God never changes His mind. Whether we are  considering God’s relationship to prayer or His relationship to the daily  decisions made by the peoples of the earth, God never changes His mind or His  plan in any way. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2"><strong>The Bible clearly teaches that God never changes His mind.</strong> Individuals  change their mind in instances when they acquire information that they  previously did not possess or when they realize that their logic was in some way  faulty. God never takes in new information, and God never possesses faulty  logic. God’s knowledge is perfect and complete in every respect. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2"><em>Because God’s knowledge is complete He never has reason to change His  mind. God’s knowledge is without error (Job 37.16).</em> The Hebrew adjective  translated “perfect” (µT;) in Job 37.16 is from a word that means “completeness”  or “integrity” (the noun µTo). It refers to the fact that God’s knowledge is  sound and without error. God knows of errors, but He has no errors in His  thinking. God’s knowledge is without oversight and without flaw. He understands  everything with perfect clarity. God thinks with perfect logic. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2"><em>God’s knowledge is complete and all-inclusive (1Jo 3.20; Heb 4.13; Mt  11.21,23).</em> There is nothing that God does not know. God does not take in  information, simply because from eternity past He knew all things from start to  finish. Not only does God know everything that will happen, He also knows  everything that could happen (Mt 11.21, 23 – God knew all the contingencies  related to Chorazin and Bethsaida). God possesses knowledge of everything that  will take place and everything that possibly could take place. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2"><em>God’s knowledge is eternal (Ac 15.18).</em> God always has, does now, and  always will, know all things. According to Acts 15.18, God has known what He  will do from ages past. God’s knowledge then is eternal. In the words of the NIV  God has known what will transpire “for ages.” Notice the following examples of  God’s perfect, complete, and eternal knowledge regarding His creation: </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">Psalm 147.4 states, “He (God) determines the number of stars and calls them  each by name.” </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">Matthew 10.29–30 states, “Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one  of them will fall to the ground apart from the will of your Father. And even the  hairs of your head are all numbered.” </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">Job 26.6 states, “Death [Sheol] is naked before God.” God knows everything  that happens in the place of the dead. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">Psalm 139.1–4 states, “O Lord, you have searched me and you know me. You know  when I sit and when I rise; you perceive my thoughts from afar. You know my  going out and my lying down; you are familiar with all my ways. Before a word is  on my tongue you know it completely, O Lord.” </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">God’s knowledge has no limitations. God’s knowledge is such that He is  incapable of learning anything. The fact that God’s knowledge is complete, means  that God knows everything and is not lacking one bit of information. Since, in  the words of John the Apostle, “God knows everything” (1Jn 3.20), He is  incapable of learning. There is no information that He does not possess. Also  the fact that God’s knowledge is eternal, means that His knowledge is intuitive.  You and I come to know something as we take in information, but God knows  everything as part of His infinite being. He knows everything intuitively. He  has always known all things. There was never a time when God did not know all  things. You and I are more knowledgeable today than we were last year because we  take in information. God knows no more today than He knew a million years ago  because a million years ago He knew everything. (God of course is not in time as  we are.) It is impossible and completely unbiblical then to say that God learns.  God is not like impotent human beings. He is not limited in knowledge and wisdom  as we are. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><font size="2"><em>Because God’s plan is perfect in every respect, He has no reason to change  His mind. God never changes (Mal 3.6; Heb 13.8; Jas 1.17).</em> The theological  term for God’s unchangeableness is “immutability.” When we say that God is  immutable or unchanging, we mean that He is changeless in His being and purposes  and is incapable of growth or decay in any way. God has never grown or  diminished. He has never learned or forgotten anything. He is not something  today that He was not yesterday. He is neither more nor less holy, loving, or  merciful than He ever was. Some evangelicals today claim that “instead of  perceiving the entire course of human existence in one timeless moment, God  comes to know events as they take place. He learns something from what  transpires.” (Richard Rice, “Biblical Support for a New Perspective” in The  Openness of God, InterVarsity Press, p. 16). Clearly when one learns he changes.  Who do I believe, those who say that God learns and changes, or God Himself, who  says of Himself that He does not? God’s Plan Never Changes (1Sa 15.29; Nu 23.19;  Ps 33.11). In Psalm 33.11 the psalmist uses synonymous parallelism to make one  clear point – that God’s plan never changes. The NIV translates this verse, “The  plans of the Lord stand firm forever, the purposes of his heart through all  generations.” The Hebrew word translated “stand forever” (dm[;) means “to stand  fast” or “to continue and abide.” The words “counsel” (</font><font face="HebraicaII"><font size="2">hx[e</font></font><font size="2">)  and “thoughts” (<font face="HebraicaII">hb;v;j}m</font>)  both refer to God’s plan for the future. God’s plan is forever established and  sure. It will never change. God’s plan is not subject to change. It is not  evolving as time goes on. </font> </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><strong><font size="2">The implications of the biblical material</font></strong><font size="2"> If God changes His mind, it  implies that His knowledge may contain errors. Changing your mind implies you  made a mistake in your original plan. If God changes His mind, it implies that  His knowledge is not complete. Changing your mind implies that you did not  originally have all the facts and now that you do, you will make a change. If  God changes His mind, it implies that His knowledge is not eternal. If God  changes His mind, it implies that He is in the process of learning. If God  changes His mind, it implies that His original plan was flawed, erroneous and/or  incomplete. This would imply two things about God. First, it would imply that  God Himself is limited and flawed and that He is capable of making mistakes.  Second, it would imply that God and His Word are not trustworthy. If God learns  and changes His mind, you would have every reason to assume that God’s plan  would consistently change as He found His own errors. Thus the plan He has  outlined in the Bible would be utterly worthless, because that plan would  probably have to be changed multiple times. Every promise and doctrine found in  Scripture would be open to question. </font> </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><strong><font size="2">What about those confusing passages?</font></strong><font size="2"> You may ask, “What about those  passages that seem to teach that God repents or changes His mind?” (Ge 6.6–8; Ex  32.8–14; 1Sa 15.10–11; Ps 106.40–45; Je 26.13,19; Jnh 3.1–2,5,10, etc.) Is that  what they are teaching? Is the Bible contradicting itself? As we have seen, the  clear teaching of Scripture is that God’s knowledge is so perfect and complete  and His person and plans so unchangeable that it would be impossible for God to  change His mind or repent of an action. What about these verses? The answer lies  in one of two places: </font> </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><em><font size="2">Some of these references are the expression of God’s emotions, not the  changing of His mind.</font></em><font size="2"> The Hebrew term <font face="HebraicaII">µjn;</font>,  sometimes translated “repent,” can mean “to have sorrow, to suffer grief, to  have compassion.” (For examples of this see the NIV of Genesis 6.6 and 1 Samuel  15.10–11.) This is probably how Exodus 32.14 should be taken. It could be  translated, “Then the Lord was moved with compassion and did not bring on His  people the disaster He had threatened.” The judgment of Israel apparently was  not part of God’s eternal plan, but Moses’ prayer for Israel was. God planned  and used Moses’ prayer, and God in His compassion did not judge Israel. </font> </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><em><font size="2">Some of these references refer to God being changeless when dealing with  changing beings.</font></em><font size="2"> The change in these contexts is not in God or His purposes  but in His dealings and relationships with changing people. God remains  changeless in His being, attitudes and purposes. However, when people change  their relationship with God, He changes His relationship with them in order to  remain changeless. One example of this is Jonah 3.9–10. Do these verses teach or  imply that God changes His mind? No, they do not. Consider what is going on in  the book of Jonah. In this book we find God giving the Ninevites an opportunity  to avoid punishment. He sends a reluctant servant to tell them that they are  going to be destroyed because of their wickedness. The question is, “What was  God’s intent in sending Jonah to them?” Apparently it was God’s intent to spare  the Ninevites. Did God change His mind? No! He intended all along to spare the  Ninevites, that is why He sent Jonah to them in the first place. God planned all  along to withhold judgment from them, and He used Jonah as a tool to help bring  it to pass. Once the Ninevites changed their ways, as God had always planned for  them to do, God changed how He treated them in conformity to His own standards.  (Obedience brings blessing; disobedience brings punishment.) When the Ninevites  changed their lives in conformity to Jonah’s preaching, God held off His  judgment as He had always planned. </font> </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana"><strong><font size="2">Conclusion</font></strong><font size="2"> Prayer does not change God’s mind. God does not plan one  thing for my life and then adjust that plan based upon whether or not I follow  it. The infinite, omniscient, omnisapient, and absolutely sovereign God has a  perfect plan for every molecule of creation, and that plan is never thwarted or  affected by anything outside of God Himself. Prayer is used by God as a tool for  the accomplishment of His eternal plan. God plans and uses prayer in the same  way He plans and uses every other type of ministry. As for God repenting and  changing His mind, in reality it never happens. Everything that happens in  creation, even God’s “adjustments” to mankind, are part of God’s eternal plan.  What looks like the changing of God’s mind to us, is actually God moving mankind  in conformity to His eternal plan.</font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ekklesia.to/does-god-repent-or-change-his-mind/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
